This page is demo scaffolding. It is not a screen the product ships.
It exists so a reviewer can reach every plane and vertical from one place. The product
itself must never offer this. A care user belongs to exactly one agency and one vertical
(SCR-114), each vertical is its own deployment (SCR-116), and the
cross-vertical and care→ops links that once existed in the mocks were deliberately
removed — 155 files lost their agency <select> and 54
“Operations” anchors were reverted.
So this file sits above care/, platform/ and
mobile/ and belongs to none of them. It wears no app chrome and carries
no agency selector of any kind — the selector is the control it replaces.
Care plane — the three verticals
Three separate deployments (SCR-116). Crossing between them is crossing services, which is why only this page does it.
The kernel screens
Not a fourth vertical.care/ screens — billing,
admin, documents, scheduling, entity, integrations, reporting — are the kernel, not a
fourth programme. RENDER-MANIFEST.md § “The generic-engine
judgment” records the app’s functional core as
“metadata-driven generic screens (Summary/list, Detail/edit, Create via RJSF)
parameterized at runtime by app/module/entity”, rendered once as
representative named screens rather than exploded per entity. That is the kernel-vs-packs
split SCR-116 deploys: one kernel, three vertical packs on top of it.
Count, stated as mine and not the manifest’s: 69
care/*.html files
carry no alr-, ppec- or hcbs- prefix. They have no
index of their own; my-work.html’s nav tree is the closest thing to one,
which is the second reason it is the door.
Platform / ops plane
The elevated realm. Different chrome, on purpose.cp-03-tenant-list.html’s outbound care links: 17 go to
hcbs-index.html, 2 go to alr-index.html, and 0 go to PPEC. There
is no vertical column on the roster and no row names a pediatric service. One inbound anchor
to PPEC does exist elsewhere in the corpus — hcbs-index.html carries a
“The PPEC set, for comparison” button — but that is a reviewer’s
comparison affordance on an index page, not a route a user of the product has. Until the owner
rules on a recast of the roster, this launcher is the only direct way to PPEC.
Mobile
Two delivered artifacts, not one./login and no
/activate on it, which the design pass records as its own defect
(D-25) and routes as WL-9067 (station activation) and
WL-9068 (shared-device shift sign-in). Nothing is minted here to fill that
gap: the round is linked because it is the entry that exists.
What the screens actually say about who the tenants are
agency-identity
chip. They do not divide one agency per vertical, and this page does not tidy them up.
care/ppec-index.html— Rio Vista Pediatric Centre, PPEC · Rio Grande Valley, TXcare/alr-index.html— Millbrook Cove, Assisted living · Boulder County, COcare/hcbs-index.html— Mesa Verde Home Care, HCBS · CO · TX · CAcare/my-work.html— Millbrook Cove, Home Care Agency
Millbrook Cove wears two different subtitles across those four screens alone — an assisted living residence in Boulder County on one, a home care agency on another. Whether the cast should be recast so each vertical has its own tenant is a decision in front of the owner right now, and pre-empting it by inventing a clean one-agency-per-vertical set here would be minting (
I-9). So the launcher shows the corpus as it is.
Not in RENDER-MANIFEST.md, deliberately. The manifest says
“if a screen is not here it does not get rendered”, and it has no
convention for declaring something that is not a screen. This page follows the precedent of
the three shared shells (care/_hcbs-shell-web.html,
mobile/_hcbs-shell-mobile.html, platform/_hcbs-shell-ops.html),
each of which sits in the tree undeclared and states on its own face
“Not a screen — it discharges no obligation.” Neither does this one.
A convention for declaring non-screens is owed and is not invented here.
Every link on this page was checked to resolve to a file that exists; nothing is linked that does not. Synthetic data only — no PHI.